Fig. 1: Sixteen graves from the narthex, and five from the main church (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 1: Sixteen graves from the narthex, and five from the main church.
Fig. 2: Fifty-eight graves from the exterior of the church (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 2: Fifty-eight graves from the exterior of the church.
Fig. 4: Example of the second type of tile grave (kalyvitis) (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 4: Example of the second type of tile grave (kalyvitis).
Fig. 5: Burial in which the left arm is folded over the sternum and the right over the abdomen (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 5: Burial in which the left arm is folded over the sternum and the right over the abdomen.
Fig. 6: Pair of silver basket-shape earrings (M44–M45) (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 6: Pair of silver basket-shape earrings (M44–M45).
Fig. 7: Bronze, gold-plated earring (M7) (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 7: Bronze, gold-plated earring (M7).
Fig. 9: Bronze, gold-plated cross (M29) (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 9: Bronze, gold-plated cross (M29).
Fig. 12: Two necklaces of glass beads (X1 and X2) (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 12: Two necklaces of glass beads (X1 and X2).
Fig. 13: Fish vertebra, possibly a gaming piece (O1) (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 13: Fish vertebra, possibly a gaming piece (O1).
Fig. 16: Skel. 004. Porotic hyperostosis on cranial fragments (Bourbou 2010–2011)
Fig. 16: Skel. 004. Porotic hyperostosis on cranial fragments.
Fig. 1: Map of Turkey and Eastern Mediterranean with the Bay of İskenderun region highlighted in red (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 1: Map of Turkey and Eastern Mediterranean with the Bay of İskenderun region highlighted in red.
Fig. 2: Bay of İskenderun survey, documented sites (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 2: Bay of İskenderun survey, documented sites.
Fig. 3: Bay of İskenderun survey, documented archaeological sites and intensively surveyed regions via pedestrian transects (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 3: Bay of İskenderun survey, documented archaeological sites (red) and intensively surveyed regions via pedestrian transects (collection units: dark yellow). Twenty square kilometers were intensively surveyed between 2004 and 2011.
Fig. 4: Satellite image of Byzantine-period Site 165 (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 4: Satellite image of Byzantine-period Site 165 as surveyed in 2007 (left) and in 2011 (right). Note area destroyed by modern development post-dating our 2007 survey of Site 165.
Fig. 5: Map of the Issos Plain (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 5: Map of the Issos Plain. Epiphaneia (Modern Gözenler: Site 1) and associated Hellenistic-to-Byzantine–period sites.
Fig. 6: Plan and satellite image of Epiphaneia (Modern Gözeneler) (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 6: Plan and satellite image of Epiphaneia (Modern Gözeneler). Top: Development of Epiphaneia from the Late Bronze (Red) through Byzantine (Blue) periods. Bottom: Satellite image of Epiphaneia with surveyed structures.
Fig. 7: Map of the İskenderun Plain (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 7: Map of the İskenderun Plain. Alexandreia kat’Isson (Modern Iskenderun, Site 58) and associated Hellenistic-to-Byzantine–period sites.
Fig. 8: Satellite image of modern İskenderun and surveyed archaeological remains indicated in red (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 8: Satellite image of modern İskenderun and surveyed archaeological remains indicated in red.
Fig. 9: Map of the Arsuz Plain (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 9: Map of the Arsuz Plain. Rhosos (Modern Arsuz/Uluçinar, Site 177) and associated Hellenistic-to-Byzantine–period sites.
Fig. 10: Satellite image of modern Arsuz and surveyed archaeological remains indicated in red (Killebrew 2010–2011)
Fig. 10: Satellite image of modern Arsuz and surveyed archaeological remains indicated in red.
Dobri Dyal Coin Finds (Stoyan Mihailov)
Spreadsheet of the 169 coins found at the Dobri Dyal excavation, led by Andrew Poulter (University of Nottingham), 2010/11
Fig. 1: Stone sculpture at the Museo Arqueológico Gregorio Aguilar Barea in Juigalpa (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 1: Stone sculpture at the Museo Arqueológico Gregorio Aguilar Barea in Juigalpa.
Fig. 2: Nicaragua (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 2: Nicaragua. The wider research region is indicated by the square.
Fig. 3: Preliminary map showing the central monumental area at El Gavilán (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 3: Preliminary map showing the central monumental area at El Gavilán.
Fig. 4: 3D Scanning equipment at work at the Museo Arqueológico Gregorio Aguilar Barea (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 4: 3D Scanning equipment at work at the Museo Arqueológico Gregorio Aguilar Barea.
Fig. 5: Unprocessed point cloud capturing El Gavilán’s site surface and vegetation (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 5: Unprocessed point cloud capturing El Gavilán’s site surface and vegetation.
Fig. 6: Test excavation in the central area of El Gavilán (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 6: Test excavation in the central area of El Gavilán.
Fig. 7: Sampling of rock material near Structure 1 (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 7: Sampling of rock material near Structure 1.
Fig. 8: Transect-walking for the ground-penetrating radar study (Geurds 2009–2010)
Fig. 8: Transect-walking for the ground-penetrating radar study.
Fig. 21: Outer face of curtain-wall and northern buttress, area E (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 21: Outer face of curtain-wall and northern buttress, area E.
Fig. 22: Outer face of curtain wall and southern buttress, area E (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 22: Outer face of curtain wall and (above left), southern buttress, area E.
Fig. 23: Photograph taken of a section of the upstanding defenses, excavated in 1933 (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 23: Photograph taken of a section of the upstanding defenses, excavated in 1933.
Fig. 24: Comparison of coin finds from Dobri Dyal and Dichin (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 24: Comparison of coin finds from Dobri Dyal and Dichin (Mihailov).
Fig. 25: Signs of root etching on a specimen from Dobri Dyal (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 25: Signs of root etching on a specimen from Dobri Dyal (Billson)
Fig. 26a: Mandible of Ursus of recovered from context 6585 (area B) (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 26a: Mandible of Ursus of recovered from context 6585 (area B) (Billson).
Fig. 26b: Detail of cuts on the madibular hinge of Ursus mandible recovered from context 6585 (area B) (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 26b: Detail of cuts on the madibular hinge of Ursus mandible recovered from context 6585 (area B) (Billson).
Fig. 26c: Detail of cut on the bucal aspect of Ursus mandible recovered from context 6585 (area B) (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 26c: Detail of cut on the bucal aspect of Ursus mandible recovered from context 6585 (area B) (Billson).
Fig. 27: Wild boar tusk in comparison to that of a domestic pig (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 27: Wild boar tusk in comparison to that of a domestic pig (Billson).
Fig 28: Graph showing the basic species representation for the site as a whole based on the total number of fragments for each species (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig 28: Graph showing the basic species representation for the site as a whole based on the total number of fragments for each species (Billson).
Fig. 30: The hilltop with the high resistance features only on the east slope (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 30: The hilltop with the high resistance features only on the east slope (Boyd).
Fig. 31: The lower southern slope of the hill (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 31: The lower southern slope of the hill (Boyd).
Fig. 32: Interpretation of structures on the southern side of the hill (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 32: Interpretation of structures on the southern side of the hill (Boyd).
Figs. 9–10: Northern face of the revetting wall (5023), area A (left); the revetting wall (right) (Poulter 2010–2011)
Figs. 9–10: Northern face of the revetting wall (5023), area A (left); the revetting wall (right).
Figs. 14–15: Plan of the northeastern corner with external buttress, area B3 (top). Northeastern corner of the defenses (bottom) (Poulter 2010–2011)
Figs. 14–15: Plan of the northeastern corner with external buttress, area B3 (top). Northeastern corner of the defenses (bottom). Note the projecting buttress.
Figs. 22–23: Outer face of curtain wall and northern buttress, area E (top); outer face of curtain wall and southern buttress, area E (below) (Poulter 2010–2011)
Figs. 22–23: Outer face of curtain wall and northern buttress, area E (top); outer face of curtain wall and southern buttress, area E (below).
Fig. 1: Dobri Dyal from the north, 2007 (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 1: Dobri Dyal from the north, 2007.
Fig. 2: Exposed core of the curtain wall, 2007 (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 2: Exposed core of the curtain wall, 2007.
Fig. 3: Contour plan of the sites with excavation areas and robber-pits, visible as surface features (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 3: Contour plan of the sites with excavation areas and robber-pits, visible as surface features.
Fig. 5: Site plan with excavation areas overlain by the geophysical survey (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 5: Site plan with excavation areas overlain by the geophysical survey, showing the high anomaly, which represents the line of the curtain-wall.
Fig. 6: The hill (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 6: The hill. Note the location of the high anomalies on the lower south side of the site.
Fig. 7: The revetting wall (5023), area A (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 7: The revetting wall (5023), area A.
Fig. 8: Northern face of the revetting wall, area A (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 8: Northern face of the revetting wall, area A.
Fig. 12: The revetting wall (6545), area B (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 12: The revetting wall (6545), area B.
Fig. 13: The northeastern corner of the defenses, area B3 (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 13: The northeastern corner of the defenses, area B3. Note the projecting buttress.
Fig. 14: Plan of the northeastern corner with external buttress, area B3 (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 14: Plan of the northeastern corner with external buttress, area B3.
Fig. 15: External elevation of the northeastern corner (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 15: External elevation of the northeastern corner. Note preserved right side of the offset and, far right, a crack in the curtain, probably due to subsidence, area B3.
Fig. 16: Foundation cut for external face of the curtain wall, area B3 (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 16: Foundation cut for external face of the curtain wall, area B3.
Fig. 17: Foundation cut for the external face of the curtain wall, area B3 (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 17: Foundation cut for the external face of the curtain wall, area B3.
Fig. 19: The outer face of the curtain wall, area E (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 19: The outer face of the curtain wall, area E.
Fig. 20: Outer eastern face of the curtain wall (9005), area E (Poulter 2010–2011)
Fig. 20: Outer eastern face of the curtain wall (9005), area E.
